Let’s Talk About … Rating Criteria – Does It Differ Across Genres?

Header - Fiona.JPG

Hey dolls! A common method of reviewing a novel (or any product for that matter) involves assigning a numerical rating of some sort. I typically notice this done in star values ranging between one and five, but this number can vary. When I write reviews on Another Book in the Wall, I do attach a star value to it, based on how I think it compares to other novels. Nearly the entire selection of books I have read from in my life are fictional, so this makes it quite difficult for me to assign star ratings to non-fiction titles. I don’t have a sturdy foundation from which I gauge the quality of which non-fiction books are exceptional, and other are mediocre. I imagine other readers have similar conflicting feelings about how to rate fiction and non-fiction titles, but lately, I’ve been struggling to compare Contemporary Fiction with Fantasy/Sci-fi. These genres have a plethora of differences, but many similarities as well. Is a four-star rating interchangeable to books from both genres?

Section dividerPersonal And Technical Aspects And Their Influence

Although there isn’t a strict regiment reviewers follow when rating novels, I typically find that many choose to focus on:

  • World Building
  • Writing/Pacing
  • Characters (Development & Likability)
  • Themes/Messages
  • Overall Execution and Enjoyment

While its simple to determine how well or poor a novel’s world building is, it can be quite challenging to incorporate aspects that are subjective, such as enjoyment. Rating scales are wonderful for assigning numerical values to objective aspects, but how do you incorporate your own personal experiences and opinions into a star value? Is it right to deduct a star from a book that is flawless in its technical aspects, but had a message you didn’t personally agree? Therefore, is this book, equivalent to one which lost a star for its poor execution or one-dimensional characters? It’s for this reason that I believe it’s vital for reviewers to explain how they rate their books and what aspects they look for in novels. I appreciate it when reviewers point out what they like and dislike about technical aspects, while also informing us of their own personal thoughts and feelings about purely subjective matters.

Section dividerAre These Factors Measured Equally, Regardless of The Genre?

All novels are unique in their own ways, so it makes it no simple feat to compare them to one another. With that being said, should technical aspects be measured by the same standards across different genres? Is the world building in a fantasy novel comparable to the setting of a contemporary? Because these aren’t necessarily the same, I personally tend to focus mostly on their respective atmospheres – the emotions and feelings authors convey through their descriptions of the characters and environment. For the most part, I believe technical aspects can be analyzed with relative parity; however, there are a few factors that I think operate outside of this rule. One of which, is realism. I would like to think I can appropriately suspend my disbelief when reading fantasy novels, but where is the line drawn for realistic fiction? Realism is nearly impossible to define to begin with, but I usually can swallow any amount of nonsense, so long as it is befitting to the realms of the story. I’m often more forgiving of this when a novel originates from the Fantasy or Science Fiction genres, because the characters reside in worlds vastly divergent from our own.

Section divider

Are Certain Genres Incapable of Being Compared?

Aside from Non-Fiction, there is one particular genre I never know how to aptly rate, because the novels from it are usually quite lovable, despite having numerous faults – fluffy YA romances. These types of novels are practically Hallmark Movies, but I almost have to force myself to look for issues, because I find these stories so enjoyable. Cliches and predictable endings are recurring factors, weaved throughout the entirety of these novels. But, how do these factors compare to novels from different genres that possess the same qualities? Are fluffy romances granted an excuse because predictability and stereotypes are expected and accepted in this genre? I’m afraid I will never resolve the battle within myself about how to rate novels from this genre, but would love to see your insight and thoughts on the matter!

Section divider

Thanks for reading, dolls! How do you rate your books? What factors do you look at when thinking about your ratings? Do you rate differently depending on the genre? Let me know in the comments!kelly (3).pngInstagram | Twitter | Goodreads | Bloglovin

52 thoughts on “Let’s Talk About … Rating Criteria – Does It Differ Across Genres?

  1. you bring up a lot of great points in this post! I’d definitely agree that book reviewers do tend to review books in all genres by each category you mentioned, but they’re not the same in each one. I think I definitely rate books differently depending on their genre. I think it also can depend on how familiar we are with a genre. For instance, I’m super familiar with contemps, so I’ll be tougher on them, but I’m not as familiar with fantasy yet, so I think I tend to give fantasy higher ratings than I do contemporary.

    Very thought-provoking post!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Great post. I will also take the quality of editing and the print into the rating as well, I know it’s not within authors control but the representation of the book to reader is also very important. And one needs to see attention to details 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Great discussion. I think in regards to fluffy YA romances that feature a lot of tropes but are still enjoyable, I haven’t resolved the dilemma either. I don’t read many romances myself (I’m all about fantasy) and wouldn’t be able to filter its nuances, but I believe people who do read solely romances are able to perceive what distinguishes a great romance from a stellar romance. Each genre has a range and subtlety of its own, so I think it really boils down to how well you know the two genres you’re comparing; like, even an average romance would seem amazing to me since I don’t know the genre very well, so I’d give it 5 stars whereas a romance expert would probably give it 3 stars or something. 😉

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for reading! ❤️
      Yeah, I think someone who is more familiar with the romance genre would be a better judge of which romances are more exceptional. I’m primarily a fantasy reader as well, so I would likely give a romance novel a higher rating than most as well. Haha

      Like

  4. This is really interesting! I mostly base my ratings on my enjoyment of the book because I figure that the technical aspects will have directly impacted how much I liked the book as well. But I find it very important to also actually write and explain the details of what i thought- the ratings just serve as a sort of summary I suppose.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I agree with this so much. For a Book Club I’m in, we read this non-fiction memoir, and I wasn’t sure how to rate it. Like, it covered really intense topics that got me to think, so that was good, but I couldn’t exactly rate it the way I would a YA book. I ended up just marking it as “Read” on Goodreads and ignoring the star rating system all together.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m glad you agree with this post, Kat! ❤️ It can be so difficult to rate nonfiction titles. For the longest time I had no clue how to rate the Diary of Anne Frank, so I believe I just gave it a neutral 3 stars 😂

      Liked by 1 person

  6. I think I’m a pretty objective ~reviewer~, meaning I write down everything objective in my review, but I base my ~ratings~ off my feelings more often than not. xD Meaning, a book can be absolutely amazing technically, but maybe I didn’t feel much while reading, so I’d deduct a whole star for that. And ratings are definitely different across genres. I don’t really take setting into consideration for fluffy reads, and like you, focus more on the atmosphere/vibe. ♥

    Like

  7. Yes, it’s hard to rate different types of books! Sometimes I’ll read a book that I think was full of literary brilliance but that was incredibly difficult for me to finish. Other times, I’ll read a book within days and have a great time doing so, but know it was full of tropes and fluff. Sometimes, for me, these books full of tropes and fluff can even be in the same genre as the books that I thought were literary brilliance or incredibly thought provoking. This can absolutely make rating difficult.

    Like

  8. This is a really interesting discussion, I honestly hadn’t put much thought into it before even though I usually judge from people’s ratings! When rating books myself I base it purely off enjoyment, which I think is the only way I can compare between genres! However, if I’ve got an ARC of a genre I don’t usually read, I often rate it higher because I know it’s just my preference affecting the review.

    Like

  9. I don’t really pay attention to star ratings because I think they are 1) very personal and 2) somewhat arbitrary. Someone could give something 2 stars because they don’t like the name of the protagonist. If I read a review, I could note that and decide it doesn’t matter because I don’t care about the name of the protagonist, generally speaking. If I just see stars I don’t know what to think!

    I’ve also seen low star ratings for books or products based on things other than the book or product. Maybe it got one star because the package was delayed or the object was broken or the box was difficult to open. I can’t look at the star and know the book is terrible. They’re saying the delivery service was terrible!

    I also think books have to be reviewed for what they are. It’s not fair to judge a picture book for not being a middle grade book or a humor story for not being serious.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I definitely agree that star ratings can truly skew how good or bad a book is. I like what you mentioned about people giving low ratings to products, purely because the delivery service was atrocious. So misleading!

      Another great point about reviewing books for what they are. I’ve been upset before about a middle grade novel not having much depth or character development, but had to remind myself that it is intended for a younger audience, so I shouldn’t judge it as it were a YA title.

      Thanks for sharing! ❤

      Liked by 1 person

  10. Great topic! I know some people are pretty regimented the way they go about rating books but I tend to go based more on how a book makes me feel. If something has a huge emotional impact on me then I do tend to rate it higher, and even will cut it some slack in the technical dept. I at least like most of the books I read so I usually rate 3 and up. I know my ratings skew high sometimes, but again, I’m a feelings person. And with something that is essentially art, and can be very subjective, I’m kind of ok with doing it that way. I think my ratings are pretty much based on this no matter what genre I’m reading.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. This is such a great discussion! I agree that it’s so hard for fluffy contemporaries! A lot of the times I can spot so many problems, and objectively it should not get a good rating, but it just makes me so happy and makes me smile so I want to give it a higher rating…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Aww, thanks, Kay! ❤

      It's so difficult to rate those darn contemporaries! Recently I read P.S. I Like You by Kasie West, and had such conflicted views about what to rate it! On the surface it had a few issues, but I hadn't enjoyed reading a book that much all year, so I wound up giving it a 5, even though it's probably closer to a 3.5 or 4 from an objective stand point. Haha.

      Like

  12. This is a great discussion post, and super thoughtful as well. Honestly, my ratings differ a lot across genres – mainly because I tend to pick up one genre over another. So, for example, I’m an avid fantasy reader so I expect a lot more from fantasy books than I do with contemporaries. My 3 stars for a fantasy is ‘meh’ but my 3 stars for a contemporary is still a book I would recommend, because I generally tend not to rate contemporaries super high in the first place. Does that make sense? Haha, anyway, I love your blog! 🙂 x

    ~ Aimal @ Bookshelves & Paperbacks

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you so much, Aimal! ❤

      My three stars benchmark for fantasy and contemporary are almost exactly the same as yours! I tend to gravitate mostly towards fantasy, so I have higher expectations for books from that genre, whereas I'm easily pleased by contemporaries.

      Like

  13. For some books, I find myself giving them a general rating and then a rating within their genre. For example, I’ve given a book a five when compared to other unreliable narrator books, but a four overall.

    I like to make the distinction because while it might not be a five overall, it might be amazing to the person looking for a really good genre x book.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Well this is a very interesting discussion but …I give a rating based mainly on the emotions the book made me live! I want to escape, to feel, to eat and walk with the characters. Then it will be a success!

    Liked by 1 person

  15. I love this post! I think it’s also important to consider the target audience. So for romantic fluff/wish fulfillment, the book may not necessarily be meant for me, so even if I don’t love it, I try to consider it as it is, not how I wish it would have been. I try to enjoy this genre because I really just don’t like it, but if I happen to read one by accident, I try not to be too hard on the book.

    For nonfiction, I break it into two categories: popular NF and industry-specific NF. The popular category (Mary Roach and Malcolm Gladwell come immediately to mind) is meant for laypeople, while industry-specific is meant for people who already have a firm foundation in whatever the book is discussing. The main question I ask of either of this is whether or not the book is true, or if there are falsehoods and fallacies that don’t hold up. If so, it’s an instant 1 star for me.

    For popular NF, would the book be understood by just about every adult who picks it up? Is there a thread to follow, or a story to become invested in? Does it balance entertainment with information? Is it engaging? At the end of it, I wind up judging popular NF by how much I learned, and how much fun it was to read. Not every chapter has to be insightful, either. I’d rate a popular NF book 5 stars if it taught me only one thing that I think I’ll carry with me in the future.

    If it’s an industry-specific NF book, my main question is: Does it actually teach me anything or give me a new way of looking at an old problem, or is it a rehashing of things I already know? These books can get away with being less engaging, I think, because the goal really is to inform, not to entertain.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for all your insight, Ellery! I definitely agree that the target audience is so important when critiquing a book.

      I never even thought about the differences between rating industry-specific NF and popular NF. Thanks for sharing! ❤

      Liked by 1 person

  16. Another great discussion, Kelly! I’m inclined to agree with you about fluffy YA romances (and even adult romances) because the expectations of stereotypes etc. already exist. However we can say the same about horror, for example, where readers may rate a horror book depending on how thrilling it is but the expectation of being scared already exists before even starting the book. It produces completely different emotions to that of a romance book so it may be impossible to compare it to a much lighter read. This post really made me think about the criteria I use to rate books I’ve read across different genres and for that I thank you!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you, love! ❤ I really enjoyed reading your point about the horror genre. It's so intriguing to think of how our expectations can affect our overall opinions of certain reads. Furthermore, it makes it so difficult to compare two vastly different novels (horror and romance). Haha.

      Liked by 1 person

  17. This is such a great post! I mostly just look at whether or not I simply enjoyed reading it. That being said, if relevant, I will also take into account how simple or complicated a book is, whether that be the content, the messages it tries to tackle, the plot, how original the idea is, etc. So a fluffy YA romance I rated 4 stars is definitely not on the same scale as say a high fantasy with immense world-building that I rated 4 stars. I’m not really that consistent either, which doesn’t help. It really all comes down to mood for me, I think. (Also, I take into account writing style, which affects how I react to certain genres too. I am way more likely to dislike a fluffy romance if the writing style is bad because the simple plot or setting isn’t there to support it, but if the writing of a fantasy with world-building isn’t great, there is more there to back it up and allow me to overlook it.)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Aww, thanks, Erin!

      I like what you said about how the importance of writing styles can vary across genres. Personally, I like writing styles in contemporaries to feel genuine and relatable, and for it be complex and sensual in fantasies. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  18. These are all great points!
    I think a lot depends on genre.
    For example world building is a very important element to fantasy, sci-fi, and any subcategories of these.
    But in a story focusing on realistic events, set in our actual world, in a well known town… it’s not really the world building, but how the real world is being presented.

    For example when i’m reading sci-fi, i like to be swept away, and feel like there’s a huuuuge world that these characters already discovered and is being presented.

    When i read police procedurals, they need to be real an no-nonsense. So if a read a thriller/mystery with a lot of unrealistic elements and fluffy unicorn crap, i’m going to rate it very low. But if i read a sci-fi that felt like it’s taking place two days from now, and there’s nothing fascinating and everything feels like real world, it will also get a low rating.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for sharing, Norrie!

      I love the point you brought up about world building. When I’m reading fantasy, I can swallow a decent amount of nonsense, but will roll my eyes if the same unrealistic elements took place in a book with a modern day setting. And vice versa.

      Liked by 1 person

  19. What a thought-provoking post, Kelly! I swear that your discussions are the best!

    I have my little niche that I read (sff, speculative fiction, mystery/thriller, and some historical fiction) and tend to hold them all to the same scale — which honestly is how much did I like this book? I have a rating breakdown that kind of explains my methodology behind my ratings which helps me infinitely.

    I have no clue how I would rate non-fiction.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Aww, thank you, Kaleena! You’re too sweet! ❤

      I tend to rate Fantasy/Sci-fi/Historical Fiction/Mystery similarly, but always find it challenging to compare these ones to contemporary and romancse. Haha.

      Rating non-fiction is nearly impossible for me!

      Like

  20. What a great point! I think I’m guilty of mentally comparing books to others I’ve read of the same genre, so depending on what I’ve read before the benchmarks would differ across genres. I’d never really considered that before now! Brilliant post.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. This is such an interesting topic, Kelly! I try to be objective but most of the time I fail badly by letting my emotions on the book reflect too much on the number I give to it! Fluffy YA romance is also a problem for me, because despite it having some cliché traits I don’t enjoy, I still end up enjoying them a lot 😂 which is why most of the time they end up with a 4 star rating on my goodreads 😅

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Aww thanks, Maria! ❤

      I try to be as objective as possible, but take my emotions into account a bit more than I probably should. Haha.

      I'm glad I'm not the only one who struggles with rating fluffy YA romances! Most that I read have 3 to 4 stars! I love them too much! Haha. 🙂

      Like

  22. Wow Kelly, what a thought-provoking post!
    I like to be quite objective when I rate a book, and I usually consider all of the factors you mentioned, while taking my own reading experience into account.
    The question of genres is very interesting…I guess it is easy to compare a book with other books in the same genre when I give it a rating, and I think I do it almost subconsciously.
    For me, the main things to look for in non-fiction are the structure and the writing style 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you, Stephen! I try to be as objective as I can be, but will still take my own enjoyment and feelings of the books into account when rating it.

      The few times when I have read non fiction, those are the two factors I looked at the most. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

You've Heard My Thoughts, Now What Are Yours?